COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via IN OFFICE, PHONE and VIDEO conferencing. Please don't hesitate to call us if you have any questions! 877-622-6671.

Justia Lawyer Rating
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Martindale-Hubbell
10 Best
Board Certified Specialist
Badge
Rue Ratings

Findings of the Full Commission

Gavel The North Carolina Court of Appeals must uphold findings of fact made by the full Commission if there is any evidence that supports the findings.

That's true even if there is substantial evidence that could support a finding to the contrary.

In the event the findings of fact that have been challenged consistent with the appeal are supported by any evidence, the Court thereafter makes a determination as to whether the findings of the Full Commission support the conclusions of law.

In the event the findings have been properly challenged and there exists no evidence to support such findings, the Court of Appeals would ordinarily reverse the decision and vacate the ruling, remanding the issue for further proceedings at the Commission level.

The Full Commission has the legal authority to consider additional evidence and/or take additional evidence if it so desires.

Full Commission is not required to do so consistent with N.C.G.S. Section 97-85.

Do the Findings Support the Conclusions?

If the findings of the Full Commission that have been challenged as part of the appeal are supported by competent evidence, the Court thereafter makes it a determination of whether those findings support the resulting conclusions of law.

Practice tip: Findings of Fact may be indeed be Conclusions of Law. Those are deemed “improperly designated findings” by the Court.

Improperly designated findings fact are considered and reviewed as legal conclusions, irrespective of the label or designation used in the pleadings.

Appeals may involve conclusions made by the Full Commission that are inconsistent with the applicable case law and legal authority under the NC Workers’ Compensation Act.

Are Lawsuits Required?

Appeals may involve disputes alleging the Commission failed to make appropriate/necessary findings of fact.

The industrial condition is not required to make findings on all evidence.

Instead, the Commission is charged with the responsibility of making findings pertaining to crucial issues raised by the evidence presented at the hearing relative to the injured employees right to compensation.

The appellate court decides only whether the conclusions are supported by the findings and are otherwise consistent with applicable statutes and laws under Work Comp Act.

If the conclusions are supported by any findings, the appellate court will ordinarily affirm the O&A (the Opinion and Award of the Industrial Commission).

If the findings are not consistent with applicable law, the Court may reverse the decision and remand the matter for an appropriate conclusion based on the existing findings of fact by the Full Commission.

Court’s Review of Findings by the Full Commission

Appellate decisions of industrial Commission rulings tend to be relatively straightforward and ordinarily “unpublished.”

In order to summarize the factual history of the matter, the Court will review the Full Commission Opinion and Award, the issues identified in any pretrial agreement, and stipulations.

In a factual summary made by the Court in its ruling, there is a focus on the unchallenged findings of fact of the Full Commission, as well as on the stipulations between the parties.

The remaining evidence ordinarily is not considered “relevant” to the appeal.

Protect Your Rights – Workplace Injuries in NC

Injured Employee Again, it does not matter if there is a substantial amount of evidence that is contrary to the findings of fact. The Court will not reverse an Opinion and Award, even if it believes the Commission came to an incorrect conclusion based on the weight of the evidence.

The Court does not consider how strong contrary evidence may be, as long as there is any evidence that supports the findings of fact.

The Court is not charged with the responsibility of reweighing the evidence or “correcting” decisions, even if it would have ruled differently upon review of the evidence.

Furthermore, any findings made by the deputy commissioner are ineffectual in the event the Full Commission has reviewed the matter and makes its own findings.

A dissent from one of the commissioners of the Full Commission has no legal effect on the nature of the findings of fact by the majority, is not binding, and is not relevant to the appellate review.

Kevin Jones – Eastern NC Workmen Compensation Lawyer

The Work Comp laws in North Carolina can be intricate and often require careful attention to detail.

Our law firm provides free, confidential consultations on legal matters involving personal injury claims, wrongful death causes of action, workplace accidents, and on-the-job injuries.

Call Kevin Jones now to schedule your free consultation: 910-378-2640

Our law firm helps people throughout eastern North Carolina, including in Jacksonville NC, Greenville NC, New Bern, Morehead City, and Beaufort, North Carolina.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
If you are looking for a highly knowledgeable, caring, and virtuous law firm to help you, Dodge Jones is the answer! You can definitely count on them to provide the best quality legal service. They are outstanding! Meghan H.
★★★★★
By far the best law firm. Ms. Colleen from the New Bern office went above and beyond. She handled the case as if the case was her own personal case. Highly recommend Dodge Jones to anyone. Joey H.